Their latest invention is Rush Poker. My first reaction was: "umm... hell no. That just seems... like a bad idea." I eventually gave it a try, but still have mixed feelings about it. It doesn't seem like something a player could make money from too easily. All that effort you put in over the years studying other players and learning how to pick up tells, worthless. Being at a new table every hand means that once you get a read on another player they're immediately taken away from you, lost into a pool of hundreds. You'll probably land at a table with them again, but not as often as you'd like.
Last night I played something like my seventh session on this, Howard Lederer's latest carnival ride of confusion. I felt good going into it because I was up on Rush poker about forty bucks thanks to a hand where I was AIPF three-ways holding AK vs KQ & 9h7h. I was all ready to fire up the internet browser and start blogging when somehow they whiffed. The hand I will share with you now is nearly identical to another hand from one of my first Rush sessions a few weeks ago (before I had this blog)

He took the lead the whole way until the turn when I figured out that I was good and raised. He called my raise, leaving me with something like $4 behind and $26 in the pot, so I think my call on the river was unavoidable. Maybe I could have pushed him off it on the turn with a bigger bet, but with such a small difference between a min-raise and a 3-bet, he probably still would have called. I wanted the action on the turn anyway so I guess I'm glad he chased the straight draw.
No comments:
Post a Comment